When you need outdoor surveillance without being tethered to a home Wi-Fi network, two different approaches dominate the market: cellular-connected cameras that work anywhere there’s mobile coverage, and solar-topped smart cameras that promise long run time without monthly fees. The Arlo Go 2 and the Eufy SoloCam S340 are both aimed at people who want flexible, truly wire-free security — but they solve the problem very differently.
Quick verdict
- Arlo Go 2 — Best when connectivity anywhere matters. LTE support and local storage make it ideal for remote cabins, RVs, construction sites, or temporary installs where Wi-Fi isn’t available.
- Eufy SoloCam S340 — Best when you want subscription-free, high-resolution coverage with solar top-up and pan/tilt flexibility — provided the camera gets enough sun and you can tolerate occasional firmware or detection quirks.
At a glance: core differences
| Area | Arlo Go 2 | Eufy SoloCam S340 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary advantage | 4G LTE + Wi-Fi — works off-grid | High-res (up to 3K) dual-lens + solar charging |
| Connectivity | LTE (cellular) and Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi only |
| Video | 1080p | Up to 3K (wide) + telephoto option |
| Power | Rechargeable battery (large capacity) | Rechargeable battery + included solar panel |
| Coverage | Fixed lens | Pan 360° + tilt 70°; wide + telephoto lenses |
| Storage | microSD (local) | Internal eMMC (8 GB) — local, no subscription required |
| Ideal for | Remote/mobile locations | Home/lot with good sunlight and need for coverage/zoom |
What each camera does well
Arlo Go 2 — strengths
- True off-grid operation. With LTE support it can stream and alert wherever a cellular signal exists — no Wi-Fi required. That’s the core selling point.
- Straightforward local storage. microSD lets you keep footage without mandatory cloud subscriptions.
- Deterrence features built in. Spotlight and siren help both record and actively deter unwanted visitors.
- Rugged and portable. Built with outdoor durability in mind, and large battery capacity for longer runtime between charges.
Trade-offs: cellular video can be data-heavy (you’ll need a data plan). Battery life depends on activity, temperature, and how often it uploads video over LTE.
Eufy SoloCam S340 — strengths
- High fidelity imaging. Dual-lens design (wide + telephoto) and up to 3K resolution deliver much clearer detail when you need to identify faces or licence plates.
- Comprehensive coverage. Pan and tilt mechanics remove most blind spots — one mounted unit can cover a much larger area.
- Solar top-up and local storage. The included solar panel reduces the need for manual recharging and the built-in storage avoids recurring cloud subscription costs.
- Smart filtering. On-device detection can reduce false alarms by distinguishing people, animals and vehicles.
Trade-offs: solar effectiveness depends on location and light exposure. Some users report motion-detection inconsistencies and occasional firmware/app playback headaches; internal storage limits require rotation or backup strategy.
Real-world considerations
- Connectivity: If you’re placing the camera where Wi-Fi is unreliable or non-existent, Arlo’s LTE option removes the biggest worry. If you have strong home Wi-Fi and want richer video, Eufy’s optics are more attractive.
- Ongoing cost vs convenience: Arlo’s LTE incurs a data cost. Eufy promotes no monthly fees (local storage), but you must manage battery charging and storage capacity.
- Reliability: Both cameras rely on firmware and app ecosystems. Expect to run firmware updates, test detection zones, and tweak settings after install. Community reports show the S340 can require patience with motion/timings; Arlo users warn about data use and real-world battery life.
- Location factors: Shade, seasonal sunlight, cold temperatures and mounting height will change performance. Solar panels work best in direct sun; batteries lose capacity in cold weather; LTE reception varies by carrier and terrain.
Which one should you buy?
- Pick the Arlo Go 2 if: you need surveillance outside the reach of Wi-Fi (remote property, RV, job site) and you’re willing to pay for a cellular data plan or already have one. It’s about assured connectivity and simple, rugged deployment.
- Pick the Eufy SoloCam S340 if: you want subscription-free recording, higher resolution and flexible viewing (pan/tilt + zoom), and your mount point gets consistent sunlight for solar charging. It’s ideal for a homeowner who values image detail and wide area coverage.
Final recommendation & practical tips
- Test before fully trusting: whichever camera you choose, run a test period to verify motion detection, battery/runtime, and playback reliability. Don’t assume factory settings are ideal.
- Mind placement: Arlo — prioritize cellular signal and a secure mount; Eufy — place where solar exposure is reliable and pan/tilt can cover your target area.
- Plan for storage and power: For Arlo, budget a data plan and a large microSD card. For Eufy, check how often the camera will record during busy times and whether 8 GB internal storage is sufficient. Consider adding a local base station or external storage if needed.
- Keep firmware updated: both makers release firmware fixes and detection improvements — update promptly and re-validate settings after major releases.
More articles for the topic
New Amazon Echo vs. Apple HomePod (2nd Gen) vs. Google Nest Audio: Deep Analyses and Comparison
Apple HomePod Comparison: Fidelity, Features, and Which to Choose
